The Odyssey: Was it Truly Epic?
Christopher Nolan. IMAX. Matt Damon. 70 mm. What do all of these words have in common? It was all we heard this summer as we geared up for what should’ve been one of the greatest movies of the year: The Odyssey.
Now, I fooled myself into thinking that my reading of The Iliad would guide me breezily along the character identities, complex relationships, and Greek mythological lore intertwined in this film. But as the beautifully-captured-in-IMAX scenes flashed before my eyes, I found myself lost in the sauce of Greek Heroes, Trojans, Gods, and A-listers that seemed to appear in every dimly lit castle. The Odyssey felt like a film for “the real ones only”— the kind of movie that deceives itself as “enjoyable” for or “resonant” with anyone, but in reality, requires a substantial foundation of knowledge to really consume in all its depth. Because of this, and the confused comments from my friends as we exited the theatre, The Odyssey felt a bit inaccessible for being such a “global phenomenon.” Yes, it is a tale as old as time. And yes, maybe it is on us moviegoers to study up on the topic before taking what felt like a 3-hour, long-anticipated test. But shouldn’t a film of this scale and size be able to acclimate all viewers to the world and lore around which such a story revolves?
Now, on the casting— Matt Damon was simply epic. Anne Hathaway, evidently, was another force in this movie— she delivered a well-rounded performance that embraced the cold reservation of the queen all while showcasing an emotional fragileness carried by a devoted wife and mother. The rest of the cast, however, did not feel seamless. For starters, Holland, widely known and loved for his sweet, innocently goofy nature, seemed to contradict the heavy transition from vulnerable youth to dutiful maturity that his character undergoes. Yes, Telemachus is supposed to be a kid “finding his way,” if we were to put it in coming-of-age terms. But Holland’s immutable softness forecasted the character as a little lost and oblivious in a world of such stature and intensity. Zendaya was just there, I must say, popping in looking like a concerned, BCE Chani to say hey every now and then. But boy did the press make it seem like she was going to be the one driving that boat— she was a synergy device, which is smart in its own way.
Overall on the casting note, I think there is something to be said about the effectiveness and value of wrangling in a cast of all-stars— but there is also something very inhibiting about this choice too. At some point, it became difficult to really buy into the characters and their narratives, when the public identity of each celebrity was so insanely strong. An overly star-studded group began to feel like a Troy-themed Met Gala, leaving me hungry for some new faces… but don’t tell Circe I said that.
Everything outside of the actual 3-hour screening of The Odyssey was magnificent and the highlight of this film-turned-full-blown cultural moment. The extreme dedication that went into transforming events in this movie into real-life experiences— from the 60-foot-tall puppet to a longship in coastal waters— was what allowed this story to live up to its epicness. A commitment to creating something meaningful, instead of just telling a story deemed meaningful… was… in itself… meaningful.
Through an audience-facing lens, this film’s historic symbolism as the first feature to be fully shot in IMAX with 70 mm cameras (not sure you’ve heard that before), was what truly made this movie epic. In a world of proliferating streaming platforms and an oversaturated digital content space, art with targeted theatrical and cinematic appeal has gotten a little lost at sea. In other words, it’s been hard, even for me, to feel motivated to go to the movie theatres to watch a film I know will get released on Netflix in a few weeks. Or 123 movies if you are feeling criminal. The Odyssey, however, established itself as a cultural movie-going movement, where audiences of all kinds were lured in by the effort and technology that went into shooting such a film, and more specifically, creating a visually-impeccable viewing experience.
For that reason, I think The Odyssey has done what all great movies do, but through a different avenue— changing the way we see the world and how we connect with it. For many films, this revelation is fueled by groundbreaking narratives, never-seen-before storylines that leave us questioning what we know. And of course, The Odyssey had an element of this with its prestige, adventure-packed story. But the creation, the backdrop of the film is what impacted me the most, creating a tidal wave of enhanced appreciation for cinematic technology, production, and movie-going. Did I walk out with my mind blown? Not quite— in fact, my ears were what were blown out, but I’m not sure who’s ready for the conversation regarding sound mixing. What I did walk out feeling, though, was fulfillment and community as I fled the theatre with every person that contributed to a sold-out screening in a time where these seats are rapidly disintegrating behind personal screens. The nonstop talk about The Odyssey was not miraculous because the film proved it to be true— it was miraculous because it was simply nonstop talk, and that doesn’t happen too much anymore. Though anything Nolan touches seems destined for this kind of attention.
I think a making-of documentary could be the real Odyssey.
If you made it to this point, you are definitely geared up to embark on the journey— if you can find a screening in IMAX any time soon. And if you watch it in standard digital, I promise to not report you.